<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Going Too Far, Or Not Far Enough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.voiceemporium.com/archives/02/going-too-far-not-far-enough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.voiceemporium.com/archives/02/going-too-far-not-far-enough/</link>
	<description>All About Your Voice &#38; Marketing It</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:02:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Nims</title>
		<link>http://www.voiceemporium.com/archives/02/going-too-far-not-far-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voiceemporium.com/?p=2142#comment-618</guid>
		<description>In my humble opinion, the person in question is not minding his store.  If you sent a message to him with a specific question, it would seem reasonable to have an answer withing a couple of business days.  If you were an actual potential client, then the response should be even quicker.

As for having your return e-mail adress added to his marketing campaign, I&#039;d say that it&#039;s an automated program gone awry.  The only people who should be on his &#039;marketing&#039; address book are those with-whome he has actually done some work for.

No matter how busy one might be, responding to requests for information or specific questions should be done as if it were a lead to a significant client who will ultimately provide a lot of work.  

There&#039;s an old question about who should you be nice to as you work your business, any business.  The answer is EVERYBODY. You never know if the next contact will lead to a large sale or series of sales events. It is a folly to think you can treat important requests with more respect than the ones who may just be a waste of time. You never go wrong being polite and respectful.  

It is true that when a person runs their own business that they can run it anyway they like. If, however, you make yourself &#039;inaccessable&#039; you may well be running your business into the ground.

Aside from that, I have no strong feelings on the subject</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my humble opinion, the person in question is not minding his store.  If you sent a message to him with a specific question, it would seem reasonable to have an answer withing a couple of business days.  If you were an actual potential client, then the response should be even quicker.</p>
<p>As for having your return e-mail adress added to his marketing campaign, I&#8217;d say that it&#8217;s an automated program gone awry.  The only people who should be on his &#8216;marketing&#8217; address book are those with-whome he has actually done some work for.</p>
<p>No matter how busy one might be, responding to requests for information or specific questions should be done as if it were a lead to a significant client who will ultimately provide a lot of work.  </p>
<p>There&#8217;s an old question about who should you be nice to as you work your business, any business.  The answer is EVERYBODY. You never know if the next contact will lead to a large sale or series of sales events. It is a folly to think you can treat important requests with more respect than the ones who may just be a waste of time. You never go wrong being polite and respectful.  </p>
<p>It is true that when a person runs their own business that they can run it anyway they like. If, however, you make yourself &#8216;inaccessable&#8217; you may well be running your business into the ground.</p>
<p>Aside from that, I have no strong feelings on the subject</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
